Chaos In Iowa: Thousands Of Furious Supporters Claim Iowa Caucus “Rigged” Against Bernie

Chaos In Iowa: Thousands Of Furious Supporters Claim Iowa Caucus “Rigged” Against Bernie

Update (0725ET): Tuesday morning has arrived…and still no results.

* * *

Did the Iowa Democratic Party hire Morgan Stanley to build the vote-counting app for its first-in-the-nation caucus? Because last night’s catastrophe made the Facebook IPO look like an organized, orderly market debut.

After the party badly botched the rollout of the results of last night’s Iowa Caucus following “quality control issues” involving the transmission of data from caucus sites to the main reporting headquarters, millions are accusing the Democratic Party of once again trying to rig the nominating contest to favor establishment candidates while undermining the insurgent campaign of ‘Democratic Socialist’ Bernie Sanders.

This technical glitch has led to one of the most electoral catastrophes in recent memory: Roughly 8 hours after results were expected, there’s still nothing, and the entire process has been plunged into chaos. The issue erupted after the Iowa Democratic Party announced late Tuesday that it had found ‘inconsistencies’ in its electronic data, prompting them to audit it against the paper trail, according to NBC News.

Party chair Troy Price said the party is “validating every piece of data we have against our paper trail. That system is taking longer than expected, but it’s in place to ensure we are eventually able to report results with full confidence.”

The state Democratic party’s communications director, Mandy McClure, said on Monday night that there were “inconsistencies” in the reporting of three sets of results. “In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report,” McClure said.

This is simply a reporting issue. The app did not go down, and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results,” McClure added.

Needless to say, polls released in recent weeks showed Bernie Sanders surging ahead, cementing him as the front-runner heading into the race. And then this glitch happens, allowing Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Joe Biden to steal the caucus-evening spotlight with the help of their cronies in the media.

After watching Democrats rig the 2016 primary in favor of Hillary Clinton, thousands have taken to twitter to express their frustration. If the caucus was an unmitigated disaster (made even more hilarious by the fact that all of the candidates invested months of their time and hundreds of millions of dollars trying to clinch the all-important first nominating contest), it was also a wellspring for political humor.

The main takeaway: Is it merely a coincidence that this epic confusion emerged after Bernie’s surge in the polls?

As millions wonder ‘what the hell happened?’, it appears a reporter with the New York Times has already sussed it out. And if her report is accurate, then instead of blaming the caucus disaster on ‘human error’, they should try ‘rank stupidity’.

While the party blamed the glitch on ‘human error’ (apparently, the party never bothered to train caucus volunteers or do a dry-run of its system) many are accusing the party of more election-rigging skullduggery as twitter sleuths quickly connected the company behind the Iowa Caucus app to Pete Buttigieg. As it turns out, it appears the company that developed the app (or rather, a company linked to the company that developed the app) was paid by the Buttigieg and Biden campaigns.

The CEO of that company has gone into digital hiding.

Klobuchar got lots of props for her big speech.

Dem Party insiders are already demanding that supporters refrain from using ‘the ‘r’ word’ to describe last night’s fiasco.

Hmmm…this is actually a good point.

So far, no official results have been released, though the Iowa Democratic Party said they expect to have them Tuesday morning. After Pete Buttigieg declared victory last night – an extremely prescient move on his part – most of the other candidates joined in, ensuring the press would be too confused to simply anoint Buttigieg as the victor because he said so (if there’s one thing the American press can do, it’s uncritically repeat the assertions of politicians).

Of course, as Chris Arnade cheekily pointed out, declaring victory amid tumult is *exactly* what a McKinsey-trained management consultant would advise.

Since our last check-in, the various campaigns have released their internal numbers, offering incomplete glimpses of the state-wide results. The Sanders campaign put out data from 40% of precincts implying a landslide Sanders victory.

Some mocked the hi-tech vote-counting system employed by Iowa Democrats.

A flurry of exit polls and internal numbers have painted wildly different versions of the outcome. NBC’s exit-poll results put Biden way ahead. At this point, even once the ‘legitimate’ numbers are released, nobody will accept them.

Sanders reporters were outraged when CNN and the rest of the TV news pack diverted coverage away from (what should/would have been) Bernie Sanders’ landmark performance to cover the entirety of Amy Klobuchar’s late-night stump speech.

As a reminder, a candidate wins the Democratic nomination only if they can secure a majority of delegates – 2,376 or more. But this total includes both pledged delegates – those awarded based on the results of primaries/caucuses – and unpledged superdelegates – party leaders who can vote for the candidate of their choosing. If Democratic leaders really possessed the courage of conviction, they’d simply stand up and say: ‘We’re going with Buttigieg, the entire primary process is merely window-dressing”.

Setting personal political preferences aside, we’d like to agree with @Singlemaltfiend: Republicans were accused of rigging the 2016 election. The Dems couldn’t even rig the goddamn Iowa caucus, even though most of the country doesn’t understand how caucuses work.

Maybe next time they can try storing the votes on a blockchain.

As the Iowa Caucus devolves into chaotic finger-pointing, markets are rallying (partly because Sanders has been preventing from declaring victory) and millions are wondering: Is this a harbinger for the rest of the process? Are we really heading toward a brokered convention that allows hundreds of super delegates to pretty much pick ‘Mike Bloomberg’ out of a hat.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 02/04/2020 – 06:20

Tags